rightbar
livemarks16.pngSubscribe to RSS
RSS FEEDS
  • Shift Blog
  • ShiftMag RSS
NEWSLETTERS
  • NEWSLETTERS
SHIFT BLOGGERS
  • SHIFT BLOGGERS
  • - Sun Ray
  • - Media Analysis
  • - Smart Money
  • - Aaron's Blog
  • - Jason's Blog
  • - Citybiker
  • - The Builder
  • - Greendesign
  • —  - Svenska
  • - Fashionblog
  • - First Person
  • - Enviroart
  • - Healthyfood
  • - Science Blogs
  •  
  • DOWNSHIFT
  • - Food
  • - Travel
  • - Hybrids Plus
  • - Style
  • - Pop Culture
  • - Politics
  • - Business
  • - Green Building
  • - Health and Beauty
  • - Science and Tech
  • - Profiles
  • - Odd and Amusing
  •  
  • ECO BLOGOSPHERE
  • - 3rliving
  • - About My Planet
  • - The Action Blog
  • - After Gutenberg
  • - Agroblogger
  • - Ailinblog
  • - Alternative Energy Blog
  • - Be Sustainable - The Weblog
  • - Jetson Green Blog
  • - Sustainablog
  • - An Inconvenient Truth
  • - Another Green World
  • - Baloghblog
  • - BIOconversion Blog
  • - Biodiesel and Ethanol Investing
  • - Black Bear Speaks
  • - BTC Elements Blog
  • - Celsias
  • - City Hippy
  • - Clean Edge
  • - Cleantech Blog
  • - Cleantech Investing
  • - Climate Action Change
  • - Climate Change Chronicles
  • - Eco-Chick
  • - Computers, Society, and Nature
  • - Conscious Clicks
  • - The Conscious Earth
  • - Cut Oil Imports
  • - Cycle Santa Monica
  • - Daily Green
  • - The Daily Score
  • - DeSmog Blog
  • - Earth Meanders
« My Eco-Safari | Main | An inconvenient truth? »

I’m Not So Sure About Hydroelectricity

Being the poster child of Agnosticism makes sure things somewhat of a luxury. I enjoy knowing that my parents will still be out shopping on Dec 24th (which is the day we celebrate Christmas in Sweden), that I keep extending my gym membership with the naive intention of actually going and that hydroelectric plants don’t emit greenhouse gases (GHGs). Of course, like in the case of the power plants (but never the gym), even our sure things sometimes take us by surprise. The Swedish Society for Nature Conservation had consultant Göran Eklöf analyse the studies claiming that many hydroelectric plants actually emit as much or even more GHGs than your everyday fossil fuel plant would, to produce the same amount of electricity. In his analysis “A wolf in sheep’s clothing? - Water power and greenhouse gases”, Eklöf emphasizes the importance of different biotopes’ relationship to carbon, the base of GHGs carbon dioxide and methane. To put it very crudely, natural habitats can emit carbon, store it or function as a carbon sink. Stagnant waters like lakes or dams naturally emit carbon, whereas for example forests often have a balanced intake and emission. So if a reservoir floods a forest area the vegetation will rot, stored carbon will be released and the net emission of GHGs will rise. Furthermore, should this emission take place in an oxygen-free surrounding (as is often the case in the bottom layers of a dam), the carbon could be released into the atmosphere in the form of methane. Methane is about 20 times more powerful a GHG than the carbon dioxide that is usually emitted.

To get exact calculations on hydroelectric GHG-emissions we need to know the specific area's pre-dam relationship to carbon, and since these theories are fairly young there isn’t an abundance of statistics. But worst case scenario, do these findings constitute the end of water power? No; if executed correctly and under the right circumstances, GHG-emissions from hydroelectric plants are minuscule compared to those from the burning of fossil fuels. Generally, higher emissions seem to come from shallow dams in tropical areas. I on the other hand can splurge on hydroelectric power without giving a thought to global warming. It’s just one of many perks that come with living in a country dominated by complete, subzero darkness six months a year.

Posted on Tuesday, December 5, 2006 at 03:17PM by Registered CommenterShift Mag | Comments2 Comments

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Great reading! But it's really not that dark, that long..-
December 11, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDanne
Great reading! But it's really not that dark, that long...
December 11, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDanne

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author:  (forget stored information)
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
↓ | ↑
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.
  

PostLink an External Response

Have a response on your own site? You can either use the [Trackback URL] for this entry, or link to your response directly.

I want to leave a comment directly on this site »
Article Title:
Article URL:
Article Excerpt (optional):
Site Name:
Site URL (optional):
Author Name:
HOME|SUBSCRIBE|COMMUNITY|ABOUT SHIFT |CONTACT US|TEAM
Shift Magazine. All Rights Reserved.website designed by envisionit media